Makita USA - Product Details -XPS01PTJ

Browse all brands ». Browse all categories ». Track saws make long, precise cuts more quickly and with greater precision than table saws or circular saws. They are light, makita cordless track saw kit system to transport, set up is quick and easy, and they produce extremely accurate cuts. Track saws excel at tasks like cutting down doors breaking down sheet goods and trim stock.

But they also provide the ability to quickly and easily make out of parallel cuts or field cuts on assembled cabinets or built-ins, a task that would require shooting boards, jigs, or be downright impossible with traditional circular or table saws.

Specific differences in the saws are listed below. To assess the manufactured accuracy of the group of five track saws, cut strips from each track saw were examined. The cuts were made at both 90 and 45 degrees. In order to eliminate as much human variability, we cut the same piece of wood for all 10 samples and the same crewmember made all 10 cuts.

Each of these saws had new blades and produced Makita Cordless Track Saw Kit Light a consistent number of high-quality cuts. But there were certainly differences when we look at a side-by-side comparison. Our method of taking and marking the samples that we would later analyze was carefully thought out and followed. We took the specimens from the face of the wood that remained in place on the large piece after completing the cut. We initially used a x USB microscope to examine the cuts.

While this method showed the blade impressions in the wood, this was almost too close a look and it was hard to create a relative ranking just using the microscope as it focused only on a tiny area of the strip. The naked eye was much better at seeing the differences between the saws.

To highlight the blemish marks and saw blade patterns in the wood, we lightly rubbed red makita cordless track saw kit system chalk lightly over the wood surface.

The results of this chalk treatment were effective in showing the blade marks and patterns. The Mafell degree cut was judged as the winner and showed virtually no marks on the cut face. Closely following Mafell, the Festool cut showed a minor amount of blade marks.

These two saws made excellent cuts. We believe this is a direct result of the thin kerf Makita blade. One of the tradeoffs with such a thin blade is the vibration or chatter that is inevitable with thinner blades. The fourth-place finish belonged to Bosch. It had some deep gouges in the wood and we felt these would be more difficult to sand out than the marks left by the Makita. We did not have an explanation for this performance. We examined the blade for an obvious defect such as chipped teeth but found nothing.

The degree cut test was a duplicate procedure of the degree cut test. The only difference was the bevel setting on the saw. The sample strips were taken from the face that was attached to the larger piece of wood and we marked the samples with red chalk to highlight any imperfections. Bosch had more pronounced markings than the Festool. The Makita came in fourth place in this test.

The thin blade made a large number of chatter marks at the top and bottom of the sample. Normally in our Head-To-Head testing, we like to makita cordless track saw kit system the test tools with a single-manufacturer set of blades to ensure that makita cordless track saw kit system are not a differentiating factor in testing performance.

However, in this Head-To-Head test, the characteristics of makita cordless track saw kit system blades were widely varied with diameter, kerf width, and the number of teeth. Each manufacturer matches its optimal blade configuration for their particular design.

No single blade would fit all the track saws. If we found a single blade manufacturer to equip the saws with a blade that met the particular factory specs, all of the blades would be different. We felt it would be a substantial deviation from the factory intent if we, for example, found blades with the same diameter and kerf thickness to outfit all of the saws.

As a result, the tests were performed with the factory supplied blades. The following table shows you the factory-supplied saw blade information:. To eliminate human error and differing force we used a weighted pulley system to test the saws. We applied the same pulling force, in the same plane as the saw blade and at the same level as the saw base plate.

In that way, we applied the force consistently to the same location on each saw s. Makita was twice as fast as the second-fastest saw. It has a clear advantage over the other saws with two battery packs and a much higher total pack energy of watt-hours.

The next closest in terms of battery pack energy is the Festool with watt-hours. How often are you going to take your shiny new track saw and go rip off lineal feet of double-thick sheet goods without interruption? But we were curious to see which of these track saws would come out on top when pressed into service until they ran out of juice.

We made sure that all of the saws had fully charged batteries and that each was mounted on its track with the same friction settings for sliding along the tracks. An 11 lb weight pulled the saws through the same material. After the saw reached the end of the material the saw was stopped and retracted to the start end of the track, the material was indexed for the next cut, and the test repeated.

We continued this process until the battery s was exhausted. None of the saws exhibited a thermal interruption and that makita cordless track saw kit system impressive for such intense use.

We counted the number of cuts that each saw made through the material. The Festool did lineal feet and Bosch did lineal feet.

The track saws had a sufficiently wide variation in battery capacity and that meant we could not rely on absolute numbers of cut length during the Run-time Test to reach a makita cordless track saw kit system relative conclusion.

This method also gives the reader a good look into the performance of the saws regardless of battery size. For example, the Bosch saw came to us as a bare tool along with a Makita Cordless Track Saw Kit 60 6. That is the configuration that we tested. The Bosch kit comes with an 8. Our makita cordless track saw kit system process ensures the Bosch saw is rated against its peers for its cut results on a per Watt-Hour basis.

Taking the largest and smallest Amp-Hr battery packs in the test, the Festool saw had watt-hr of energy while the Mafell had 99 watt-hr. On the basis of just these two numbers, one would expect the Festool saw to cut a much greater number of linear feet as compared to the Mafell.

The Makita saw cut a whole lot more pieces. It made 27 full length rips compared to Mafells 8 rips. But which track saw is most efficient when we level the field by calculating the length of cut in feet per watt-hour?

We used Watt-Hr as the standard unit of measure. Under these normalized conditions, would the Festool out cut the Mafell when comparing total battery pack energy? When looking at feet cut per watt-hour of power the Makita saw won the run-time test.

The results between the last four saws were remarkably close with a spread of results from 1. The Festool score of 0. Upon closer examination, we may have figured out why those makita cordless track saw kit system were standing apart from the rest. In a prolonged run-time test such as this, the wide kerf is probably the prime reason for the score in this test.

The Makita cordless track saw kit system is simply using a lot of energy to makita cordless track saw kit system a wider path in the material. We do not think the close pairing of these two percentages is a coincidence.

The overall performance rankings are shown, below. We took all of the data from both makita cordless track saw kit system Speed Test and the normalized Run-time Test and makita cordless track saw kit system the final Performance Scores. The Overall Performance Rankings are shown, below:.

Festool track saw on run-time cut table — Note 11 lb. Track saws are feature-rich tools, we looked at 19 different features on these saws rating them 1 thru 5.

Mafell was a runaway with the best features of them all, coming in with 34 points, 12 points ahead of the second-place Festool with 46 points. Third makita cordless track saw kit system was Makita and Bosch very close behind with scores of 48 and 49 points respectively. It would take too much time breaking down all 19 features so we decided to give makita cordless track saw kit system feedback on ten major, more important features.

Fine depth adjustments allow the user to dial in the depth of cut. Festool had the best set up with a push-button slide with positive stops at 1mm increments and a top-mounted micro-adjust knob. Its depth of cut scale also offers indicators for use with or without the track, and also has an imperial scale. Mafell came in second, it has a similar adjustment but requires a wrench. For cutting off track, the depth of scale pointer rotates to indicate depth.

Bosch took third place with a push-button slide with 1mm stops in makita cordless track saw kit system metric and imperial scales, but no micro-adjustment. Makita has only metric scales and has a slide adjustment with a lock-knob.

Dewalt is similar to Makita but with a lower quality knob fit and finish. The Dewalt depth knob has to be backed way off before the depth stop will move freely. All but one saw in this group have two knobs to unlock and control the bevel function. Mafell took the lead with a single control that locks and unlocks the bevel at both ends.

Its bevel range of 48 degrees is also the highest in the test. In order to bevel to -1 and or 48 degrees, there are two easy to operate buttons. Festool, makita cordless track saw kit system the rest of the saws, uses front and back locking bevel knobs.

Makita Volt X2 LXT Lithium-Ion (36V) Brushless /2 in. Plunge Circular Saw Kit Ah with bonus 39 in. Metal Guide Rail-XPS01PTJ - The Home Depot. Volt X2 LXT Lithium-Ion (36V) Brushless /2 in. Plunge Circular Saw Kit Ah with bonus 39 in. Metal Guide Rail. by Makita. (84) $ TOP/5(84). Makita's Auto-Start Wireless System (AWS ®) uses Bluetooth ® technology for wireless power-on and power-off communication between the equipped tool and dust extractor. Once connected via AWS ®, your dust extractor will automatically power on or off when your cordless tool starts or stops, running only when your cordless tool is in use.

Wood Turning Lathe For Beginners Mac Cutlery Drawer Under Hob Up Diy Woodworking Projects Youtube 72