ONIE is an Open Compute Project open source initiative contributed by Cumulus Networks that defines an open “install environment” for bare metal network switches. www.-   www.- enables open and collaborative research in the area of network function processing (NFP) in server networking hardware that includes 10, 40 and GbE Intelligent Server Adapters (ISA). This community-driven portal is designed to serve the growing need by the academic community to conduct cutting-edge research in the areas of host-based networking datapath offload and acceleration techniques.  An open-source hardware build-it-yourself device to remote-control up to 48 devices via their RS serial port. → www.- There are countless Free an Open Source Linux/BSD distributions to choose from for your router. However, there are many outdated recommendations on the internet, so it's not an easy choice. For that reason, we have decided to create a definitive firewall comparison for   For many years we have been selling hardware for building Open Source firewalls and routers. Over the last year, we have installed and configured most, if not all the distributions out there. We install and configure pfSense, OPNSense, OpenWRT, ClearOS, IPFire, and other OSes every day, so we have a good idea which Operating systems work better than others. We don't make any money from any software vendors, which make this recommendation relatively objective. Open Source Ecology defines itself as “a network of farmers, engineers, and supporters that for the last two years has been creating the Global Village Construction Set, an open source, low-cost, high performance technological platform that allows for the easy, DIY fabrication of the 50 different Industrial Machines that it takes to build a sustainable civilization with modern comforts”. Open Source Ecology, was founded in by Marcin Jakubowski but the project went visible on the world stage when Marcin gave this spectacular talk at a TED conference. It will be a open source hardware projects 2020 network and voluntary play of mutual forces… In this structure composed of innumerable villages, there will be ever widening, never ascending circles. Thanks also to all the creators who have taken the effort to certify their products. Ahrdware projects show that high-end equipment and machinery manufacturers are participating in the Open Source Hardware community. Industry Meaning the industry that the creator is operating within. These are typically sophisticated embedded devices and testing or diagnostic tools. Is there a disagreement over the scope of other licenses and belief that they may in fact apply to hardware?

I personally give money to support Open Source Ecology every month as one of their True Fans , because I truly believe the work they do today is creating rings on the water that will travel far into the future and make planet Earth a better place.

They just released this first draft today, and it will be refactored over this year as directions clarify. Launched by a concerned global network of citizen scientists to track and counter the decline of honey bee populations, Open Source Beehives are developing open source sensor kits that can track a number of hive metrics from temperature, humidity, to a host of others. WikiHouse is an open source building system.

Many designers, collaborating to make it simple for everyone to design, print and assemble beautiful, low-energy homes, customised to their needs. What if food production could be automated? Together we can take back ownership of our food, localize production, and feed 9 billion people sustainably. PirateBox is a DIY anonymous offline file-sharing and communications system built with free software and inexpensive off-the-shelf hardware.

It allows users to share files anonymously. Also check out LibraryBox , a fork of PirateBox customized for educational, library, and other needs. We are a worldwide community of farmers that build and modify our own tools. We share our hacks online and at meet ups because we become better farmers when we work together. Designed to be downloaded and made locally, Opendesk furniture is fast, affordable, sustainable and made on demand, just for you.

Arduino is an open-source electronics platform based on easy-to-use hardware and software. Arduino has been used in thousands of different projects and applications. Arduino boards are able to read inputs — light on a sensor, a finger on a button, or a Twitter message — and turn it into an output — activating a motor, turning on an LED, publishing something online. Also check out Local Motors , another community of enthusiasts building cool machines together.

Project Ara is the codename for an initiative by Google that aims to develop an open hardware platform for creating highly modular smartphones. RepRap takes the form of a free desktop 3D printer capable of printing plastic objects. Since many parts of RepRap are made from plastic and RepRap prints those parts, RepRap self-replicates by making a kit of itself — a kit that anyone can assemble given time and materials.

OpenKnit is an open-source, low cost, digital fabrication tool that affords the user the opportunity to create his own bespoke clothing from digital files. Starting from the raw material, the yarn, and straight to its end use, a sweater for example, in about an hour.

Designing and producing clothes digitally and wearing them can now happen in the very same place, rewarding the user with the ability to make decisions regarding creativity and responsibility. Controllable by smartphone or tablet. OpenROV is an open-source, low-cost underwater robot for exploration and education.

This is the full-featured, open-source multicopter UAV controller that won the Sparkfun and Autonomous Vehicle Competition dominating with the top five spots. A team of developers from around the globe are constantly improving and refining the performance and capabilities of Copter. The aim of the Open Hand Project is to make robotic prosthetic hands more accessible to amputees.

If all of us keep feeding our energy into the current system of Big Ag, Big Finance and Big Consumption, nothing will change. But if more people withdraw their consent and build their own, local alternatives, things will change. Open Source is a great example of this. Permaculture is another example.

As entrepreneur and permaculture teacher David Blume, writes:. Around the world people are demonstrating that, not only are there alternatives, there are alternatives that allow us all to take care of each other and the rest of the species we live with, and to direct surpluses from our designs back to this care.

These are the three main tenets of Permaculture design. We will do it with or without their help. I like to say, if you want to end transnational capitalism, the very opposite of bioregionalism , then stop giving them your capital.

Neither of these are presented as options, so those creators would presumably default to Other in this instance. There are deeper questions not covered here, like why are creators choosing these licenses? Creators are also taken at their word when submitting their license selection that the claimed license is indeed in-use. Because the OSHWA certification relies on self-reporting with an enforcement mechanism, it is possible that these licenses have changed over time.

For more on this, read the certification License Agreement. Hardware also faces unique licensing challenges because of the upstream nature of components from various suppliers that hardware companies may or may not be able to make available—think a processor on a single board computer. While consensus is continuously evolving, we believe that conversations around licensing will continue to be central to this community. You can get updates from what we are observing by signing up for the newsletter below or following OSHdata on Twitter.

One of the most exciting elements of this report is seeing the accelerated growth in the number of certified projects. In year one, there was a predictable surge where getting from 0 to certifications took only days. There is a policy-driver behind this, beyond the initial excitement about the creation of the program. Knowing that there would be Open Source Hardware Projects 2020 Git a lot of interest in getting certification number one for a given country, OSHWA instituted a drawing system.

Every company interested in certifying a project submitted theirs ahead of time. Then a winner was drawn from that group. The more entries that a company submitted, the higher their odds of getting certification number one for their given country. This led to a one-time spike in participation at the outset. After this initial spike settled down, it took over one year days to get from certifications to Getting from to took under a year days and finally from to only days.

Certifications generally come in three waves. First is the steady, incremental single project certifications. Next are multi-product releases, for example several versions of a project, or a single project with accessories and components.

They are in many cases already open source, but deciding to formalize their participation in the certification program.

All three of these are important and not captured in the overall certification numbers. The distinction becomes more clear when evaluating certifications individually. Another way of looking at growth in the certification program is looking at the number of certified projects per year.

When considering the growth from this perspective, the initial surge from the first year described earlier in this section of the report is more apparent. There is a dip in year two, but a strong bounceback in year three and continued growth in year four. Looking at certification data for year-to-date, the data indicates there will be continued year-over-year growth for the program.

In other words, there should be more projects certified in than were certified in This is something we can begin to understand better by considering certifications by Creator.

A total of creators have combined to certify over products and projects. This calculates to a median of nearly 2. There are certain companies that are more active than others, contributing multiple—if not dozens—of projects to the certification directory. A single certification can be anything from a simple one-part design, to a complex system with hundreds of components or more.

A single complex machine could either be a single certification, or it could be hundreds of certifications. Creators also have an open field when submitting their certifications. We see discrepancies where a single creator uses different names between submissions.

For example, submitting as a company name in one submission and submitting as a product brand in another submission — while they are in practice both submitted by the same organization. This may be intentional or accidental. When it comes to how to certify bundled versus unbundled ,which name to use, etc. For the high volume participating companies, many of them would benefit from more visibility and support in the community. Some names are generally recognized in the community as measured by revenue, social media following, presence at events, etc.

There is a large base of companies with a single certified product who represent potential growth for the community. More research is required to determine whether they have plans or current additional projects that could also be certified, or if they only have plans for a single project at this time and it is already certified.

This group includes some high profile companies in the community. Do they not see value in the certification? Is the cost of participation too high? The leading certifying individuals and organizations are a diverse group, spanning numerous countries, product categories, and price points. The participants span multinational technology corporations, small- and mid-size open source oriented businesses, and even several individual hobbyists.

This breadth of participation over the years demonstrates that many types of organizations see value in formally participating in the Open Source Hardware community. There are more recent certifications that would affect the data in this section of the report certifications submitted as recently as March In particular, it is worth noting that Field Ready has maintained a Open Source Hardware Projects 2020 Pc strong pace of certifying new projects in In between conducting analysis and finalizing this report, they have moved into the top slot as the single creator with the highest number of certifications.

Further, as mentioned earlier in this section, there are discrepancies in submissions that affect certification numbers by Creator. These reporting lags are unavoidable until OSHdata is automated and generated in real-time. Incidentally, dynamic reporting is something we would like to implement with financial support!

One of the most exciting aspects of putting this report together was seeing the global scale of the Open Source Hardware community. There are participating individuals and organizations in 36 countries, Open Source Hardware Projects 2020 Google spanning North and South America, Europe, Asia, and Australia.

While the United States is a leader by a long shot, Bulgaria has strong participation and Europe as a whole is worth considering as well. There are also countries that recently had their first certified project, like Turkey, which represent exciting growth and future potential for this community. Project Type is the area of certification data that has the greatest need for improvement.

The options presented to certifying individuals and organizations are inconsistent, with categories spanning use cases, industries, and methods of production. Some insight can be gleaned from this data, for example the leading selected Project Types span Electronics, Tools, 3D Printing, and Education. Overall, the current Project Type data makes it difficult to draw conclusions. With better data, segmented Open Source Hardware Projects 2020 List analysis could be done like considering the average sale price by category.

Industry-specific research could be done about the price premium that Open Source Hardware products command, or reduced research and development costs versus proprietary alternatives. We believe there is a lot of opportunity and potential for improvement in this area. Currently, project type is one category with pre-defined options.

We suggest three categories be created to address the intention behind project type: Fabrication, Industry, and Application.

To be clear, this data is not available at this time. In order for it to be made available moving forward, the certification application would need to be revised by OSHWA. For a full outline of other ideas we are considering, visit the Road Map. Signifying the method in which the creator fabricates the project as it is being certified.

Can this be made at home with consumer-grade equipment, does it require the prosumer-level equipment found in a typical makerspace, or are industrial-grade machines and tools required? This will help show the level of investment required to replicate or clone a project, which will contextualize other aspects of the source code like the Bill of Materials BOM. Meaning the industry that the creator is operating within.

This could be accomplished using conventional industry classification codes. These vary around the world, one that is well established in North America is the North American Industry Classification System NAICS , which is used by governmental agencies in classifying business establishments for collecting, analyzing, and publishing statistical data related to the business economy.

This layer of classification would be specific to the application or use case for the end user. It may be the most difficult to come up with a set of these, however our initial thought is that it would cover the type of activity that this project is for.

Outside of industry, the work that is being done. So this could be research and development, prototyping, testing, production, education, and other similar descriptors that span industry types. Finally, the existing open tag system used for keywords allows creators to append additional classifications or distinctions as they see fit. So for example, a 3D printing-related project may want to specify that they are associated with the RepRap project.

This enables additional layers of classification beyond what preset options permit. Where do we go from here? If you already have feedback, use the Contact Form to get in touch. If you want to follow new updates, subscribe to the newsletter below. Let us know what you think on Twitter by tagging OSHdata. We know, writing a message might be outdated.

Open Hardware Monitor In Game Overlay 20mm Straight Router Bit Best Japanese Wood Carving Tools Uk