The CERN Open Hardware Licence was originally written for CERN designs hosted in the Open Hardware Repository. It can also be used by any designer wishing to share design information using a licence compliant with the OSHW definition criteria. If you would like to contribute to make it better, please subscribe to the Discourse forum and submit any issue you may have. CERN Open Hardware Licence v2. CERN OHL version 2. Contains the licence texts for the three variants and a rationale document to explain the decisions we took while drafting them. CERN Open Hardware Licence V2, an introduction. Hardware License TAPR Open является лицензия используется в аппаратных с открытым исходным кодом проектов. Он был создан Tucson Amateur Packet Radio (TAPR), международной радиолюбительской организацией. Версия была опубликована года. Согласно официальному веб-сайту, как и Стандартная общественная лицензия GNU, OHL призвана гарантировать свободу распространения и создания. Он запрещает любому, кто получает права по OHL, отказывать любому другому лицензиату в тех же правах на копирование, изменение и распространение документации, а также на создание, использование и распростране. Cloud Platform. часовые мероприятия, которые познакомят Вас с современными технологическими решениями на примере систем клиентов Oracle. Oracle Live.  Канал License & Hardware. Для партнеров, которые занимаются разработкой, обслуживанием или продажами, используя лицензии на программное обеспечение или оборудование Oracle. Oracle PartnerNetwork. Программа. Канал License & Hardware.  Путь партнера License & Hardware идеально Вам подходит, если Ваша деятельность по освоению рынка сконцентрирована на лицензиях на программные продукты Oracle и портфеле оборудования. Как стать участником Oracle PartnerNetwork? Смотреть: Краткое руководство по правам на перепродажу. Javier Serrano Why do you want to be on the board? Adam N. How do you use open source hardware products? Michael Weinberg, Open hardware platform license President at Public Knowledge and a board member of the Open Source Hardware Association, tells us, "Software is protected by copyright and protected automatically open hardware platform license, so you can safely assume that you have something to license when you write software. You signed out in another tab or window. Science and Public Policy. Creative Commons CC licensing is a subject that crops up with increasing frequency, particularly in discussions of open hardware licensing models.

The report examines how the open source hardware community came together to produce lifesaving medical equipment at the onset of the COVID pandemic, and the role of government authorities in that process. It finds that although some parts of the government tried to facilitate the community, in most cases there was a mismatch between what the government expected and what the OSHW community was doing.

Nevertheless, the OSHW community significantly augmented the availability of medical supplies through their grassroots response. The report also provides lessons learned and recommendations to help the community and government agencies better respond Open Source Iot Hardware Platform to future crises together. As we get approach the Open Hardware Summit on April 9th, we are now soliciting talk proposals from interested speakers.

The Open Hardware Summit is for presenting, discussing, and learning about open hardware of all kinds. The summit examines open hardware applications, practices, and theory, ranging from environmental sensors to 3D printable medical devices to open hardware processors and beyond. We are interested in open hardware on its own as well as in relation to topics such as software, design, business, law, and education.

Past talks have featured topics such as advances in space propulsion, humanitarian projects, right to repair legislation, open hardware in education, and open hardware marketing. For our eleventh edition we are especially looking for speakers who can offer insights around the role of open hardware in the COVID pandemic, open hardware medical devices, and related topics.

We invite talk proposals from individuals and groups. Find all the details over at the summit site. The Open Hardware summit will be held online again, Friday April 9, Just like this year, the summit will be livestreamed, but ticket holders will have access to additional interactive portions of the summit like meet-and-greets, workshops, and sponsor booths. Find details, including ticket and sponsorship information at We look forward to seeing you in the chat then!

You can find an overview here , or click here for the full report. Welcome to the following board members! Here are the results:. Self-nomination demonstrates that the candidate has a personal commitment to serving on the OSHWA board. The candidates outline their motivation and qualifications so voters can make informed decisions. OSHWA board members are elected for two year terms. Terms are staggered so that only a portion of the OSHWA board terms expire in any given year in order to maintain continuity within the board.

Elections are held each year for the portion of the board seats that are open in that year. This year, that was five board seats. In addition to the general announcement, we directly reach out to potential candidates with diverse backgrounds, suggesting they nominate themselves.

We use online voting for board elections. This API will make it easier to apply for certification directly from where you already document your hardware, as well as empower research, visualizations, and explorations of currently certified hardware.

Since its creation in , this free program has certified hardware from over 45 countries on every continent except Antarctica. Whenever you see the certification logo on hardware:.

You know that it complies with the definition and that the documentation can be found using its unique identifier UID.

Write access means that you can submit certification applications directly instead of using the application form. If you already have all of the application information in a system, there is no need to retype them into a webform. We hope that this will make it easier for entities that certify large amounts of hardware to build the certification process directly into their standard workflow.

Read access gives you access to information about hardware that has already been certified. This will make it easier to explore the data for research, create compelling visualizations of certified hardware, and build customized lenses to understand what is happening in open source hardware. The first thing you can do is get a key and start exploring the API itself. The team at Objectively has created detailed documentation , code snippets, and sandboxes that make it easy to test out all of the features.

In the longer term, we hope that the community will build better ways to both submit applications for certification and present information about certified hardware. OSHWA expects to maintain our application form and certification list for the foreseeable future. That being said, we are also happy to share and possibly cede the stage to better ways to get information into and out of the system as they come along.

For now, let us know what you do with the API! You can tweet to us OHSummit or send us an email at certification oshwa. The report is a snapshot of the open source hardware community as it exists in , ten years after the first Open Hardware Summit.

It helps existing members of the open source hardware community take stock of where it is, and new members of the community understand the state of affairs today. The open source hardware community has grown tremendously in the past decade. That growth is a testament to the viability of the idea of open source hardware. It can also create challenges when the community wants to talk to itself — let alone create welcoming pathways for new community members.

The report allows the open source hardware world to collectively identify what is working, share insights, and rally around shared challenges. It distills lessons learned and describes the collective understanding of the state of open source hardware. The report provides guidelines for how open source hardware can be a viable approach to hardware development, as well as identifies situations where open source hardware may not be the strongest approach.

It also examines challenges that remain unresolved in , along with opportunities for open source hardware in the future. Like any weather report, this document is a snapshot of a moment in time. It was originally intended to flow from an in-person workshop held in connection with the tenth anniversary Open Hardware Summit at the Engelberg Center. When the Summit went virtual , that workshop transformed into a series of interviews with a cross section of the open source hardware community.

Common themes, concerns, and challenges emerged during those discussions. The report provides an opportunity to summarize, distill, and universalize those insights. It makes it easier for the community to understand what is working in most places, and what challenges still demand our collective attention.

While this report is distilled from community input, it will also benefit from additional thoughts, concerns, and observations.

That is where we invite comments from the community, both on the substance of the report and on the form of the report itself. Let us know if a snapshot report is useful to you, and what we can do to make it more useful in the future. Finally, thank you to everyone who took the time to contribute to this report. Some — but certainly not all — of them are listed in the acknowledgement section of the report.

We also welcome outreach from other members of the community who did not participate this year, especially if they might be interested in participating in a future report. All questions were optional, so you may notice response counts do not always add up to We ask these questions as part of our efforts to promote diversity in the community, but these too were optional and anonymous.

Interested in more granular results for any of these questions? Reach out to us at info oshwa. Board members will hold a 2-year position.

Once board members have been chosen by the community, the board will appoint a President, VP, and Secretary. The vote will be open on Oct. Members will be emailed a link to vote. Here are the nominees in no particular order:.

Why do you want to be on the board? I am excited about how far we have come with the open source hardware certification program and believe that it can become an effective way to identify open source hardware in a wide range of fields. I also think that OSHWA as an organization can continue to act as a place for the open source hardware community to speak with itself, and as an entry point into the community for new members.

What qualifies you to be a board member? I have been on the OSHWA board for a number of years already, and served as the board chair for a number of those. I helped launch the OSHWA open source hardware certification program and continue to help oversee it. I am enthusiastic about the role that open source hardware can play in the world, and love being part of an organization that can bring such a wide ranging community together.

Open Source Hardware Association will give me a bigger platform to contribute to the community at large with the influence of evangelizing more people through speaking, engagement, and collaborations. I want the entire hardware community to also enjoy my experience as an advisory board member of the Intel innovator program. I also think the African region is not heavily represented in the association, with the great influence of becoming a board member I will impact the sensitization in my region to bring more people both corporate and individual members to join, give them a platform to certify their hardware designs.

I am talking about thousands of hardware developers in the community. Over the past 10 years, I have been educationally, professionally, and generally proven for my skills. I was part of the open-source hyperloop team rLoop , I contributed as an embedded system engineer, I was selected as intel software innovator and later became an Intel Board member for the innovator program, I have organized over 50 meetups in Nigeria.

Just recently I was part of the dream team awardee at the Hackaday competition. Intermediate forms analogous to compiled computer code — such as printer-ready copper artwork from a CAD program — are not allowed as substitutes.

The license may require that the design files are provided in fully-documented, open format s. Scope The documentation for the hardware must clearly specify what portion of the design, if not all, is being released under the license. Necessary Software If the licensed design requires software, embedded or otherwise, to operate properly and fulfill its essential functions, then the license may require that one of the following conditions are met: a The interfaces are sufficiently documented such that it could reasonably be considered straightforward to write open source software that allows the device to operate properly and fulfill its essential functions.

For example, this may include the use of detailed signal timing diagrams or pseudocode to clearly illustrate the interface in operation. Derived Works The license shall allow modifications and derived works, and shall allow them to be distributed under the same terms as the license of the original work. The license shall allow for the manufacture, sale, distribution, and use of products created from the design files, the design files themselves, and derivatives thereof.

Free redistribution The license shall not restrict any party from selling or giving away the project documentation. The license shall not require a royalty or other fee for such sale.

The license shall not require any royalty or fee related to the sale of derived works. The license may require that this information be accessible to the end-user using the device normally, but shall not specify a specific format of display.

The license may require derived works to carry a different name or version number from the original design. No Discrimination Against Persons or Groups The license must not discriminate against any person or group of persons.

No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor The license must not restrict anyone from making use of the work including manufactured hardware in a specific field of endeavor. For example, it must not restrict the hardware from being used in a business, or from being used in nuclear research.

Distribution of License The rights granted by the license must apply to all to whom the work is redistributed without the need for execution of an additional license by those parties. License Must Not Be Specific to a Product The rights granted by the license must not depend on the licensed work being part of a particular product. If a portion is extracted from a work and used or distributed within the terms of the license, all parties to whom that work is redistributed should have the same rights as those that are granted for the original work.

License Must Not Restrict Other Hardware or Software The license must not place restrictions on other items that are aggregated with the licensed work but not derivative of it. For example, the license must not insist that all other hardware sold with the licensed item be open source, nor that only open source software be used external to the device.

License Must Be Technology-Neutral No provision of the license may be predicated on any individual technology, specific part or component, material, or style of interface or use thereof. Afterword The signatories of this Open Source Hardware definition recognize that the open source movement represents only one way of sharing information.

We encourage and support all forms of openness and collaboration, whether or not they fit this definition. Initial list from freedomdefined. Aaron Clarke, aaronclarke. Abhimanyu Singh Udawat, Explore Labs.

Adam Mayer, Makerbot Industries. Adam N. Adam Wolf, Wayne and Layne. Akiba, FreakLabs. Alan Pack, Photo Booth King. Alberto Fabiano, Garoa Hacker Clube. Alexander Olikevich, OpenFabLab. Amanda Wozniak, Ninja Networks. Anand Tamboli, Knewron. Andrew Plumb, ClothBot Designs. Andrew Sliwinski, OmniCorpDetroit. Andrew Stone, Toasted Circuits. Andrew Wenzlaff, Contain Rain. Anool Mahidharia, WyoLum. Arthur Wolf, Smoothie. Asim Baig, Tinkeract.

Ayah Bdeir, littleBits. Bastian Bittorf, bittorf wireless. Benjamin Gaulon, Recyclism. Benjamin Gray, phenoptix. Bergmann Markus, morethanfunctional. Bernard Pratz, hackable:Devices. Bernt Weber, Splashelec.

Bertrand Le Roy, Nwazet. Bhagyashri Sharangpani, Bhasha Technologies. Bill Shaw, Inanimate Reason. Bob Waldron, MakerPlane. Boseji, Electronics For Bharat , A. R Labs. Brett Hagman, Rogue Robotics , Wiring.

Used Woodworking Machinery Uk Kit Hand Planes For Sale Uk Inc Diy Steam Bending Wood Youtube Soft Close Drawer Slides Maintenance In