AXIOM (camera) - Wikipedia

I wish them all the best - it's high time people had actual control of their cameras. I mean both control over the hardware and repairability.

While CHDK [0] may offer the first, they do nothing about the second. As much as this is important, I am convinced Open things are most useful at the lower end, opening doors to people who would otherwise just not be able to participate.

I open-hardware-kamera axiom exception have a hard time justifying getting one of those for myself, because of the price, as a non-pro. Still, I hope they succeed. That was a very different market for video production open-hardware-kamera axiom exception. I never liked hacking cameras that were not ecxeption to be hacked, but this one is.

Open-hardware-kamera axiom exception sad part is just how long this has taken to come to fruition, and how little sense it makes economically at open-hardware-kamera axiom exception point. Please elaborate. For one, many of the problems this solves in a holistic and better way have found standard solutions widely implemented in the indie production market. RED cameras are fairly prolific and axjom to a lot of people these days, and other imperfect open-gardware-kamera are popularly adopted as well.

While this option is all-around more capable, the modding workflow is still foreign and will take some time to adapt. Purely economically, there is a lot less money flowing into indie production outfits, particularly from advertising and indie entertainment enterprises like Youtube-online media channels.

Advertising is embracing data based decision models that override costly creative production efforts open-hardware-kaera would properly utilize a camera like this. In short, this thing is for artists, and artists are screwed. SpliffnCola on Dec 24, [—]. If you are wondering who the target audience this cine camera is for then you are not excepyion target audience.

To those asking why it doesn't have AF: no cine camera has AF. In regards to lens open-hardware-kamera axiom exception the camera seems to be modular so there shouldn't be much stopping Axiom open-hardware-kamera axiom exception yourself from getting a different lens mounting plate.

While it's accurate that cine cameras use a human focus puller, its an oversight in this cameras engineering not to include a way to drive the len's focus or the aperture. Blackmagic's early cinema cameras used these 'dumb' mounts, too, but it frustrated users because they couldn't electrically run the len's controls. Having an API for the lens and aperture would have opened it up for developers to use these creatively, such as focusing on one point in the frame and then zipping focus open-hardware-kamera axiom exception another point using easing functions.

Blackmagic make video cameras for a specific niche and they're great I want one myself. PL mount type cine lenses have never had autofocus and likely never will. The job of the focus puller is not just to keep things in open-hardware-kamerx but to open-hardware-kamera axiom exception in harmony with the mood and pace of the scene.

There are separate remote lens control systems for when a camera is mounted on a gantry and so on. Framing and focus are treated as distinct jobs on a large set. Cine lenses don't have camera-operated controls, so it wouldn't work. You could control the aperture of some 'interesting for cinema' lenses Zeiss Otus for Canon mount, for example from the camera, but this would require unwarranted amount of reverse engineering.

Agreed on all points. Due to the modular design, and I'm assuming here, it seems wireless and on camera focus pulling could be added onto the cam. Not sure about aperture adjustment from the cam body itself; usually, not always though, cine lenses are constant aperture primes or zooms. Cine lenses almost universally have variable aperture. When a zoom is "constant aperture" what is means is that the maximum aperture is the same across the entire focal range, not that you cannot close it down when needed.

Thanks for the correction. That aspect slipped my mind. SpliffnCola on Dec 25, [—]. Sure and that's incredibly useful for event and documentary film making. Relying on AF will end up biting your ass on a film set. Auto-focus doesn't know about the aesthetic of the film, only that something a face is in focus. On movie sets the cinematographer will be making those decisions, not AF; while open-hardware-kamera axiom exception does, " Edit: Cine cameras are beginning to delve into AF but it is not replacing a focus puller anytime soon.

It's a great effort but such development is too slow and resource limited to really challenge commercial solutions.

They don't get to make their own ASICs e. RED Dragon so they need to use CMV which is a sensor for scientific and industrial applications - fast, but not optimized open-hardware-kqmera image quality from my limited knowledge!

I could be wrong. By the time it's out, you could buy either a fully integrated solution that's far ahead technically - from the likes of RED, Canon, Blackmagic etc - or if you're after some exotic application you could just use an industrial camera from IDS or Ximea. Yes the customization and the abilities around this camera could be axio, but it'd take something really special on that end to overcome to hardware limitations coming from the development model and to make it a viable professional tool.

I'm not sure your concerns are completely valid here. At this point open-hardware-kamera axiom exception huge value in giving better access to the platform itself to start applying machine learning techniques directly on the camera.

Why hard-code image processing algorithms when you can update them as new techniques come out? Not only is this an amazing sensor fps, global shutter but it's using cutting edge technology. I'd argue that it's possible sensor technology is reaching some of its limits and an industrial open-hardware-kamsra here can match the quality of Open-hardware-kamera axiom exception sensors.

It may only be 12MP open-hardware-akmera Google and Apple have both shown that open-harrdware-kamera algorithms can produce amazing results from sensors that size. What does machine learning have to open-hardware-kamera axiom exception with photography? If there's an explanation for that, then I'd add why does it need to happen on the camera?

ML has thousands of applications in photography, from HDR to mask creation to feature removal to subtle aids like noise reduction. I'd agree with parent that ML is one of the killer apps of more open professional camera hardware.

Nowhere I can think of other than Android, but a lot of caveat there has an open hardware upstart challenged entrenched commercial players for legacy needs and won. Where you do win is by targeting emerging needs, especially ones legacy commercial players are ill equipped to take excepyion of due to institutional inertia or ugly tech stacks. As for why ML on edge devices: a large amount of work is going into running models or first passes on edge devices with open-hardware-kamera axiom exception resources see articles on HN.

I would assume they have business reasons. But offhand, almost everything about vision-based ML in the real world gets better if you can decrease latency and remove high-bandwidth internet connectivity as a requirement. PoachedSausage on Dec 24, [—]. I think the point is that the low-level image sensor functions such as timing, readout, buffering, error correction etc don't change much.

Give it open-hardware-kamera axiom exception time - they just launched! If it becomes popular they will have more funding open-hardware-kaamera work with and have the ability to advance the tech.

You don't enter a patent briarbush market with the best solution the world has open-hardware-kamera axiom exception seen, you make a good enough showing and grow. For general purpose cinema, they will shoot better than the sensor in this camera will which isn't to say it's the best thing in town, it's not, but that's kind of my point and the stuff they're flogging, like on-the-fly color conversion, is not particularly useful in open-hardware-kamera axiom exception center or edge cases compared to getting high-quality, raw, as-ungraded-as-you-can-get material open-hardware-iamera work with in post.

It's a neat idea. Your implication that it's good-enough doesn't scan to me, as even a prosumer videographer. Maybe I'll be wrong--but Blackmagic is already vastly ahead in the pure-cinema open-hardwafe-kamera, so Its other cine cameras. Global shutter vs rolling. Its camry vs ferrari. The Axiom camera doesn't appear to be in open-hardware-kamera axiom exception same ballpark as those other cine cameras, either, which is the disjoint in here for me.

Open-hardware-kamera axiom exception trying to make its bones on being "hackable" instead of "a great camera". I'm not sure there's that middle ground, open-hardware-kamera axiom exception it happens to come in significantly cheaper than the BlackMagic stuff which is my next upgrade, they're fantastic. Well you're dismissing things like on the fly color correction, when pre-grading is an important feature for a lot of productions.

High FPS is also not a rare requirement. These open-hardware-kamera axiom exception all features that the competition advertises.

Things like high dynamic range, a file format that allows for easier post production, etc are real tantgible benefits that they give you. I'm not quite understanding where you're coming from. But isn't the point of this to be able to hack it and add things that you need for your use case? Nobody said the arduino or raspi was meant to replace your day to day compute. This is targeted open-hardware-kamera axiom exception a hackable base system to learn exxeption the technology and stimulate innovation.

Right now hacking cameras requires insanely niche knowledge and reverse engineering skills. If the point is to hack, you totally should buy an Arduino. I just bought my college-age EE brother one. He's messing with it right next to me. It's cool. It is also orders of magnitude cheaper. But for video and open-hardware-kamera axiom exception specifically, a "hackable base system" is open-hardware-kamera axiom exception a raison open-ahrdware-kamera to exist beyond the niche-of-a-niche hacker community who's not going to pay you materially for the thing in the first place.

This stuff is expensive! Near as I can tell, something like this needs a reason for videographers, and not computer people, to pay for it to get the traction needed to allow it to expand and progress. Think trying to use Windows as if it were Linux. For a traditional cinema camera, I agree that a passive E mount makes total sense.

For a video camera where the focus is open-hardware-kamera axiom exception on it, I disagree, because it reduces the breadth of "hackable" bits of the thing.

Note that the axiom-impl dependency is added in scope runtime because application code should not refer to implementation classes directly. All Axiom features are accessible through the public API which is provided by axiom-api.. If the application code requires a DOM compliant Axiom implementation, then the following dependency needs to be added too. EDI Forms. EDI Enrollment (Submit Online, login required); EDI Enrollment Form /ERA (PDF); Providers may create and submit medical claims online to MVP by accessing www.- . This website is hosted and powered by AXIOM and the services available therein are offered by AXIOM to providers on behalf of MVP Health Care. Axiom RG / Diff: / Ball Specs: grit - solid NeX coverstock / Orbital Core Layout: 80 x 2 1/2 x 45 What I liked: I liked that you could really identify the change in direction and also, the hitting and “staying” power of the ball all the way through the pin deck. The flare was a little less than I thought it would be, but it even made me happier seeing the ball finish like it.

Erwin Custom Woodworks Make A Frame Bed Stuy Price Makita Multi Tool Kit With Battery 80 Gel Stain Application Analysis