I have a Macbook Pro as my work issued PC, I like it for the most part but battery life is not its strong point. A bit address space would allow the processor to directly address only 4 GB of data, a size surpassed by applications such as video processing and database engines. In the s and early s, when open hardware x86 mac and were still in common use, the term x86 usually represented any compatible CPU. An entire market segment will be glorified iPads with built in keyboards, likely with the iOS AppStore open hardware x86 mac. I suspect the desktops are suffering similarly, and porting of some apps is not simply a matter of recompiling. But it freed the designers up, allowing them to use larger registers, not limited by the size of the FPU registers. The hardest hit open hardware x86 mac this announcement will be developers of Mac software.

Because storage space is so constrained today. People love their pretty pictures. That would all be common across ISAs. I am actually thinking of more of a Fat Binary install where you get both code and the installer decides which gets installed. This, or a slight variation that can be left to the developers. They can provide either fat binaries and installers that discard the useless version s , or they can provide separate binaries for each architecture and web installers that download the correct binaries.

I remember a time when Linus Torvalds said he doubted that Linux would ever be ported to anything other than i, due to its architecture-specific low-level functions and optimizations.

Very true. Everything works exactly like AMD The last two things I installed Blender and Handbrake compiled right out of the box. I was particularly surprised about x with all of its hand-coded assembly, but the author is very sharp in how he handles multiple platforms.

If so, that may be why it was pretty easy. A computer is much more than the processor or even the SOC at its heart. For Apple, they only need to abstract at the user space level. But to have OS freedom, you need abstracted platform interfaces that allows for some common OS IPL discovery and load along with a way to deliver information about the hardware to the OS.

The problem gets more complex when you need to support somewhat arbitrary add-in hardware and gets even worse if the platform firmware or OS IPL needs to use these peripherals. Sometimes for a popular platform these things can be reverse engineered provided there is either a lack of security measures or that they can be broken. A big hit may be on open source developers, who often rely on Hackintosh or similar for testing Mac ports of the applications. At the same time, old Mac hardware will be useless for testing also.

I think the number of open source developers who actually use a real Mac exceeds those using a hackintosh by a minimum of three orders of magnitude. If that is true, I wonder why? The struggles the Linux heads at work have with simple things like docking and connecting a mouse suggests this may still be the case. You can absolutely sign apps with a Hackintosh. Maybee a real serious HTML developer…. Because all serious laptops of the same form factor as the Macbooks these days only have a few USB-C ports and need a docking port.

I give you that the keyboard of current Macbooks is shitty. Maybe better than the previous generation, but still shitty.

It runs Proxmox with PCIe passthrough. It can run x86 and ARM virtual machines on it too. Mac lovers are all about the logo and the perceived cachet of having an over priced laptop, because they think it makes it look like their company values them more and it is a badge to show off to others.

At the end of the day, most servers are Linux so they are most likely working with Linux boxes anyway. I use a virtual machine to run OSX. But that goes away now. This is yet another cash grab from Apple. They know in 2 years they will have people being forced to upgrade because OSX will stop being supported on x86 hardware, which they are banking on being a huge windfall.

Nick: I think your estimate is off by a couple orders of magnitude, probably biased by your own reasons for avoiding Apple hardware. By the time I needed to upgrade hardware, it just made more sense to switch to Apple. Because Hackintosh was a total unicorn, once in eternity, black swan…. They seem to do best when they buy things like their OS or procs from other people.

This will definitely make servicing a throttled affair. One of the many reasons I avoid them as much as possible. But they will send their paid ad shills in here to keep us from doubting their abilities as they always do with a number of forums and websites. Within years any x86 mac will be worthless. I literally got it for free. Now they are shifting yet again. With one swoop they kill the entire second hand market for x86 macs as well.

Bottom line: buy a new mac. Apple Open Ecu Hardware Not Found switches to ARM, and when the existing machine base starts dying the software vendors follow suit. Apple laptops have a predicted mechanical half-life around 15 years in use, but the battery shelf-life means the average mac laptop will be replaced at year 6 — 8. It ran too hot. Who knows, with 4 and 12nm processes today it might be great. The people doing the PPC design just could not squeeze one bit more performance out of the PPC design, nor could they get the power consumption down.

A dual G5 Mac tower also made a pretty decent room warmer. When Apple abandoned 68k, it was because they were the biggest consumers of 68k chips, and therefore paying the bulk of development costs to try to keep 68k current. The switch to ARM was another inevitable move. It would literally be easier for Adobe to create their own operating system than deal with that herd of cats. Linux is lacking in all of those. It would also be easier for Adobe to create their own operating system based on BSD to allow easy porting, than deal with all the whining of how slow all their stuff runs on ARM unless rewritten from the ground up.

That said, Adobe lost the game when they started forcing cloud subscription. Competition like Affinity are catching up in features, so their days are numbered. Not gonna happen. Graphics programs need instant user response. Even a tiny bit of lag between your pen and the canvas totally ruins your style. Screen streaming for applications like Photoshop are a total killer, because drawing demands no lag. If your pen input is lagging just a few extra milliseconds, your lines turn from curves to squares.

I purchased the full CS6 suite as soon as I heard they were going cloud, and have been using it ever since. I have and will purchase every application Affinity makes. I still use Photoshop and Illustrator because all my clients are still on Adobe, but I support Affinity with my purchases in the hope they continue to make inroads in the creative industries.

Rather than working to embrace widely established standards across multiple platforms, nvidia reinvents the wheel and forces their substandard proprietary stack down our throats. Hardware support relies on the manufacturer of said hardware caring enough to work with Linux kernel developers to make the hardware fully functional. AMD, on the other hand, had no problem with it.

Their open-source stack with the exception of loadable firmware is included in the Linux kernel on nearly every distribution. Even Intel pulled it off with their iGPUs. The same applies to the gaming industry, solely because of nvidia and Microsoft. Software availability is usually not always the catalyst for hardware support.

Say Adobe has a really good year and decides to turn some of those profits into a Linux team, and they successfully port Indesign and Photoshop to Linux.

Companies like nvidia would have incentive and partnership opportunities to make an AMD-esque stack so that Adobe products would have feature parity, regardless of GPU. My audio interface Peachtree Audio X1 works flawlessly. The problem is open source. Do you really want thousands of contributors working in their spare time and making guesses about hardware? And you depend on it to make deadlines? I use Linux based systems all the time. The hosts have a crashy tendency and chasing down dependencies and configurations to do something simple is incredibly frustrating and time consuming.

The only thing lacking from OS X for me is better ways to use tools developed for Linux. There is a reason that video and music professionals pay full price for new Macs, like very nicely integrated reliable high performance and never crashing. Your gripe is with specific distributions behaving poorly. File a bug report. I cannot say I share your experiences. Meet production deadlines in video, design, CAD, etc. As with Final cut pro, the Adobe suite, and all that.

Linux is the kernel. If something is reverse-engineered, I avoid it like the plague. I will not knowingly buy hardware which requires reverse-engineered drivers to operate. I do my homework. Yes, this was a while ago. Chances are it will work just by plugging in — at least on Windows and Mac.

The difference is that the Linux ecosystem is actively rejecting direct support by the manufacturers by rejecting them writing binary only drivers to protect their IP, and because the Linux ecosystem is so fragmented that trying to support everyone is a nightmare anyways. I get the idea, we want to maintain our own drivers so we can support them indefinitely, but for the regular user that means nobody maintains their drivers because:.

Which goes back to the original point. Linux as a platform for end user software and productivity is horrible, and it would be easier for Adobe to write their own OS Open Hardware Dsp 800 from scratch and distribute that, than try to reach customers through Linux. Way to miss the point. Insisting on using Linux is like having a voluntary gluten allergy.

The Linux ecosystem is horrible for the HW manufacturers, because they have to rely on third parties to provide the user experience for their product. Even supporting the top five is too much effort for such a small market. In Linux, the general assumption is that the hardware you buy is only components.

You buy the chip, not the product. The OEMs are not interested in that. It was still the same general bullshit with patchy hardware support, patchy software support, broken this, broken that…. Nothing has really changed. I have to spend many working days just configuring Linux instead of getting anything done, which is ironic since the entire point of the exercise was to save money and time by using FOSS.

There was a very good reason for that. The standard X. Plain and simply: X. Org sucked really bad and they were being difficult to work with as an organization, so nVidia bypassed them to make their stuff work. In fact, nVidia was the only one that could provide proper hardware acceleration under Linux while the others were broken in various ways.

You bypass the community and provide proper support for your own hardware, and the community complains about it. Your talking points might hold up to some scrutiny if they were even remotely true or in line with the subject at hand. Anyone with even a cursory understanding of the subject matter already knows this.

Which, you know, was my point. Your entire premise relies on outmoded and outdated information that is woefully incorrect due — in no small part — to your confirmation biases. The Linux community is a lot like a Presbyterian convention. Getting things working on each one is like switching from right hand drive to left hand drive cars. I was Open Hardware Walkie Talkie Not Found talking about nVidia before Wayland. Windows 10 on ARM can run x86 apps. They do binary translation at first run so the result can be faster than emulation.

Why is it always the marketing people that decides what hardware we should be able to buy? Lately it seem most hardware are riddled with bugs, and their attitude is just fix it in software.. Back in the day there was something called hardware documentation, and you could write your own firmware.. Steve Jobs was essentially just the marketing guy at Apple.

And yet he managed to proverbially sell sand to suckers in Sahara. For example, calling his engineers idiots for not being able to use dynamic software libraries with ROM substituting for more expensive RAM. They were pushing the same products using the same adverts and losing market share rapidly, so they hired Jobs back exactly because he could spin bullshit better than anyone else.

That was his job. The iPhone has turned into a software atrocity. Apple was positioned well to have some of the best x86 computers and run some top notch software, but then, seemingly to coincide with the passing of Steve, they lost their focus on software quality, instead taking the running away from the bear analogy to heart.

I suspect the desktops are suffering similarly, and porting of some apps is not simply a matter of recompiling.

So I wait for the bug reports, security holes, and general software mayhem out of Cupertino. Likely the choice was made because Intel processors have been having lots of issues with security, sideband attacks, listening in on caches, whatever, processes cannot be separated well enough on Intel. And the basic cause is that they add features which are great for Intel or for hardware manufacturers, but not quite useful for end-users.

Apple is ditching intel because their goal is to turn all computers into iPad type devices. Basically advertising delivery and user tracking devices to monetize user data. If the performance is there, I think it probably is a good move. A potential problem is multi-source of CPU manufacturing. But I can see the logic in ARM across the whole line. I am sure of a few bumps in the process. But long-term could be good for them.

On the other-hand more potential for closed system abuse…. While not directly comparable the Altivec versions of PPC are significantly different from the original too. I suspect that this will also come with a greater shift towards cloud based software as a service. On the last couple releases of OS X downloads and various docs from apps go to iCloud by default, which is why I had a hell of a time finding my latest work or downloads until I shut off freakin iCloud.

Apple has been screwing with the inrerface and breaking my old habits and breaking their carved-in-stone HMI rules. I have assume this is an attempt to merge Finder with iOS. A truly terrible idea. I here you. My IPhone my work required type phone. Rather have android , keeps wanting to connect to ICloud asking for password….

Pain as it pops up every day. Applications ran on the physical box. Search Advanced search…. Buyer's Guide. Installation Guide. Guides Start Here! What's new. Home JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.

Heavy Duty Hidden Shelf Supports Mod Woodturning Project Kits Canada Black Metal Dining Room Table Legs 10