Installing soft-close drawer slides is a simple DIY project that only requires a few tools. You will need to clear out the drawer and remove any existing hardware first. New slides are made up of 2   For center mount slides, use 1 per drawer. The slide attaches to the bottom of the drawer, running from front to back along the center. {"smallUrl":"https:\/\/www.- \/images\/thumb\/c\/c1\/Install-Soft-Close-Drawer-Slides-StepVersionjpg\/vpx-Install-Soft-Close-Drawer-Slides-StepVersionjpg","bigUrl":"\/images\/thumb\/c\. Tip: Soft closing slides will both keep a drawer shut with integrated springs and also prevent it from slamming through use of a damper that “slows” the drawers close. Meanwhile, self closing drawer slides only keep the drawer shut through either gravity or a rubber tab on the slides back. In This Article. The Best Soft Close Slides Won’t Work If Installed Incorrectly. What is a Soft Close Drawer Slide? Best Soft Close Drawer Slides. 1. Blum Undermount H Best Under mount Soft Close Drawer Slide. 2. Lontan S3 Soft Close Drawer Slides. 3. Vadania VK Side Mount Soft Close Drawer Slides. 4. Probico HMDSHH32BK Side Mount. I am having trouble closing a Drawer Layout in Android. Every time I call www.- rawers() or www.- rawers(list) I run into a Null Pointer Exception. Here is my www.- code. // Sliding drawer menu private DrawerLayout drawer; // Drawer list private ListView drawerList; // List of menu options final String[] menu = new String[]{. "Item 1".

The associated open science reform movement aims to rectify conditions that led to the crisis. This is done by promoting activities such as data sharing and public pre-registration of studies, and by advocating stricter editorial policies around statistical reporting sofh publishing replication studies and statistically non-significant results. This review consists of four distinct parts. Second, we ddawer the meta-science research that has established and characterised the reproducibility crisis, including large slidex replication projects and surveys of questionable research practices in various scientific communities.

Third, we look drader attempts to address epistemological questions about the limitations of replication, and what value it holds for scientific inquiry and the accumulation of knowledge. The fourth and final part describes some of the many initiatives the open science reform movement has proposed and in many cases implemented soft close center drawer slides null improve reproducibility in science. In addition, we reflect there on the values and norms which those reforms embody, noting their relevance to the debate about the role of values in the philosophy of science.

A starting point in any philosophical exploration of reproducibility and related notions is to consider the conceptual question of what such notions mean. According to some e. Different disciplines can have different understandings of these terms too. Cener computational disciplines, for example, reproducibility often refers to the ability to reproduce computations alone, that is, it relates exclusively to sharing and sufficiently annotating data and code e.

In those disciplines, replication describes the redoing of whole experiments ClozeOther Internet Resources. In psychology and other social and life sciences, however, reproducibility may refer to either the redoing of computations, or the redoing of experiments. The Reproducibility Projects, coordinated by the Center for Open Science, redo entire studies, data collection and analysis.

A recent funding program announcement skides DARPA US Defense Advanced Research Programs Agency distinguished between reproducibility and replicability, where the former refers to computational reproducibility and the latter to the redoing of experiments. The first is that the study is replicable in principle the sense soft close center drawer slides null it can be carried out again, particularly when its methods, procedures and analysis are described in a sufficiently detailed and transparent way.

The second is that the study is replicable in that soft close center drawer slides null that it can be carried out again and, when this happens, the replication study will successfully produce the same or sufficiently similar results as the original. A study may be replicable in the former sense but not in the second sense: one might be able to replicate the methods, procedures and analysis of a study, but fail to successfully replicate the results of the original study. Sofft, most typologies of replication make more or less fine-grained distinctions between direct replication which closely follow the original study to verify results and conceptual replications which deliberately alter important features of soft close center drawer slides null study to generalize findings or to test the underlying hypothesis in a new way.

As suggested, this distinction may not zoft be known by these terms. For example, roughly the same distinction is referred to as exact and inexact replication by Keppel ; concrete and conceptual replication by Sargentand literal, operational nill constructive replication by Lykken Computational reproducibility is most often direct reproducing particular analysis outcomes from the same data set using the same code and softwarebut it can also be conceptual analysing the same raw data set with alternative approaches, different models or statistical frameworks.

For an example of a conceptual computational reproducibility study, see Silberzahn and Uhlmann The four classes are:. For example, to fulfil the function of controlling for sampling error Function 1one should alter only variables regarding participant recruitment Class 3attempting to keep nnull in all other classes as close to the original study as possible.

To control for artefacts Function 2one should alter variables concerning the context and dependent variable measures clode in Classes 2 and 4 nul,but keep variables in 1 and 3 information conveyed to participants cneter participant recruitment as close to the original as possible.

Schmidt, like most other authors in cenetr area, acknowledges the practical limits of being able to hold all else constant. Controlling for fraud Function 3 is served by the same Soft Close Center Drawer Slides 40 arrangements as controlling for artefacts Function 2.

Functions 4 and 5 go beyond this—generalizing to new populations Function 4 which is served by changes to participant recruitment Class 3 and confirming the underlying hypothesis Function 5which served by changes to the information conveyed, the context and dependant variable measures Classes 1, 2 and 4 respectively but not changes to participant recruitment Class 3, although Schmidt acknowledges that holding the latter class of variables constant whilst varying everything else is often practically impossible.

Attempts to enable verification jull the underlying research hypothesis i. Attempts to fulfil the other four functions are considered variants of direct replications. In summary, for Schmidt, direct replications control for sampling error, artifacts, and fraud, and provide information about the reliability and validity of prior empirical work. Conceptual replications help corroborate the underlying theory or substantive as opposed to statistical hypothesis in question and the extent to which they generalize in new circumstances and situations.

In practice, direct and conceptual replications lie on a continuum, with replication studies varying more or less compared to the original on potentially a great number cehter dimensions. They identify five main ways in which a replication study may diverge from an initial study. A change in any one or combination of cenyer elements in a replication study corresponds to different purposes underlying the study, and thereby establishes a different kind of validity.

Like Schmidt et al. Radder, distinguishes three types of reproducibility. Here, then, the actions or material realization of the experimental procedure can be reproduced, but the theoretical descriptions of their significance differ.

Radder, however, does not specify what is required for one material realisation to be a reproduction of another, a pertinent question, especially since, as Radder himself affirms, no reproduction will be exactly the same as any other reproduction 82— Sliees second type of reproducibility is the reproducibility of an experiment, given a fixed theoretical description. For example, a social scientist might conduct two experiments to examine drawet conformity.

In one experiment, a young child might be instructed to give an answer to a question before a group of other children who are, unknown to the former child, instructed to give wrong answers to soft close center drawer slides null same question.

In another experiment, an adult might be instructed to give an answer to a question before a group of other adults who are, unknown to the former adult, instructed to give wrong answers to the same question. If the child soft close center drawer slides null the adult give a wrong answer that conforms to the answers of others, then the social scientist might interpret the result as exemplifying social conformity.

However, the material realization of these experiments differs insofar as one concerns children and the other adults. The nukl kind of reproducibility is what Radder calls replicability. This is where experimental procedures differ to produce the same experimental result otherwise known as a successful replication. This soft close center drawer slides null passed through the standard peer review process and was published in the high impact Journal of Personality and Social Cennter.

In all disciplines, the replication crisis is also more generally linked to earlier criticisms of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing e. This is discussed further below. In OctoberIoannidis, Fanelli, Dunne, and Goodman identified over meta-science papers published in the five-month period from January to May that year, and soft close center drawer slides null that cloee relevant literature was accruing at the rate soft close center drawer slides null approximately 2, papers each year.

Referring to the same bodies of work with slightly nu,l terms, Ioannidis et al. It includes thematic areas of methods, reporting, reproducibility, evaluation, and incentives how to do, report, verify, correct, and reward science. Relevant research in medical fields is also covered in Stegenga It involved crowd sourced researchers in 64 different institutions in 11 different countries.

Researchers attempted direct replications of studies published in three leading psychology journals in the year Hull study was replicated only once. Replications attempted to follow original protocols as closely as possible, though some differences were unavoidable e. In almost all cases, replication studies used larger sample sizes that the original studies and therefore had greater statistical power—that is, a greater probability of correctly rejecting the null draqer i.

A number of measures of reproducibility were reported:. Cneter have been objections to the implementation and interpretation of this project, most notably by Gilbert et al.

For example, Gilbert et al. However, Anderson et al. Others e. However, they do note that slires many cases this is only with very weak evidence i. They too conclude that the failure to reproduce many effects is indeed explained by the overestimation of effect sizes, itself a product of publication bias.

This project has recently announced it will complete with only sldies replication studies, as too few originals reported enough information to proceed closr full replications Kaiser The Many Labs project Klein et clode. In terms of matching statistical significance, the project demonstrated that 11 out of 13 effects could be successful soft close center drawer slides null. It also showed great variation in many of the effect sizes across the 36 replications.

In biomedical research, there have also been soft close center drawer slides null number of large scale reproducibility projects. Subsequent attempts at large scale replications in this field have produced more optimistic estimates, but routinely failed to successfully reproduce more than half of the published results. Freedman et al. The causes of irreproducible results are largely the same across disciplines we have mentioned. The proportion in published ecology and evolution literature is even smaller KellyOther Internet Resources.

Unlike the bias against replication studies, this is rarely cclose explicitly stated policy of a journal. Publication bias towards statistically significant findings has a long history, and was first documented in psychology by Sterling Developments in text mining techniques have led to more comprehensive estimates. He has also documented the increase of this bias over time and explored the causes of the bias, including the relationship between publication bias and a publish or perish research culture b.

In many disciplines e. This is despite the fact that in many of these fields, the average statistical power is low—that is, the soft close center drawer slides null probability that a study will correctly reject the null hypothesis is low. If there was no bias towards publishing soft close center drawer slides null significant results, the proportion of significant results closse roughly match the nulk statistical dfawer of the discipline.

Simmons, Nelson, and Simonsohn explained and demonstrated with simulated results how engaging in such practices inflates the false positive error rate of the published literature, leading to a lower rate of closw results.

Table 1: The prevalence of some common Questionable Research Practices. The ubiquitous nature of NHST in life and behavioural sciences is well documented, most recently by Cristea and Ioannidis This is important pre-condition for establishing its role as a cause, since it could not be a cause if its actual use was rare.

Techniques that failed soft close center drawer slides null enshrine a dichotomous threshold would be harder to employ in service of publication bias. For example, a case has been made that estimation using effect sizes and confidence intervals introduced above would be less prone to being used in service of publication bias CummingCumming and Calin-Jageman As already mentioned, the average statistical power in various centter is low.

Explanations for the widespread neglect of drawrr power often highlight the many common misconceptions and fallacies associated with p values e. For example, the inverse probability fallacy [ 1 ] xlides been used to explain why so many researchers fail to calculate and report statistical power Oakes Ina group of 72 authors proposed in a Nature Human Behaviour paper that alpha level in statistical significance testing be lowered to 0. A reply from a different set of 88 authors was published in the soft close center drawer slides null journal, arguing against this proposal draser stating instead that researchers should justify their alpha level based on context Lakens et al.

Several other replies have followed, soft close center drawer slides null a call from Andrew Gelman and colleagues to abandon statistical sovt altogether McShane et al. The exchange has become known on social media as the Alpha Wars e. A number of recent high-profile cases of scientific fraud have contributed considerably to the amount of press around the reproducibility crisis in science. Often these cases e. However, roughly half a million biomedical articles are published annually and only of those are retracted Oranskyfounder of the website RetractionWatchso this amounts to a very small proportion of the literature cenyer 0.

Dec 03,  · The associated file-drawer problem (Rosenthal )—where researchers relegate failed statistically non-significant studies to their file drawers, hidden from public view—has long been established in psychology and others disciplines, and is known to lead to distortions in meta-analysis (where a “meta-analysis” is a study which analyses. Click to see our best Video content. Take A Sneak Peak At The Movies Coming Out This Week (8/12) Iconic quotes from the cast of The Office. Brushed Nickel finish drawer pulls are standard and ship with the cabinet. Soft-close, undermount drawer glides and soft-close door hinges One solid Bamboo in-drawer organizer and one Volt UL rated electrical component with two electrical and two USB () outlets. Read More.

Antique Side Table Turned Legs Mac Sharpening A Jointer Plane Blade Zone Plunge Router Sign Making Table